Longitudinal studies of development are good - but what are they good for?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Suffix arrays: what are they good for?
Recently the theoretical community has displayed a flurry of interest in suffix arrays, and compressed suffix arrays. New, asymptotically optimal algorithms for construction, search, and compression of suffix arrays have been proposed. In this talk we will present our investigations into the practicalities of these latest developments. In particular, we investigate whether suffix arrays can ind...
متن کاملWhat are Software Practice Studies Good For?
Software engineering and ethnography has fundamental different perspectives on practice, and different aims. Is it possible to use results from ethnographic studies when doing software-engineering research? In this article some of these problems are taken up and exemplified by trying to use some ethnographic inspired studies to shed some light on a comparison of two different philosophical unde...
متن کاملOntologies for Neuroscience: What are they and What are they Good for?
Current information technology practices in neuroscience make it difficult to understand the organization of the brain across spatial scales. Subcellular junctional connectivity, cytoarchitectural local connectivity, and long-range topographical connectivity are just a few of the relevant data domains that must be synthesized in order to make sense of the brain. However, due to the heterogeneit...
متن کاملOntologies for neuroscience : what are they and what are they good for ? Stephen
Current information technology practices in neuroscience make it difficult to understand the organization of the brain across spatial scales. Subcellular junctional connectivity, cytoarchitectural local connectivity, and long-range topographical connectivity are just a few of the relevant data domains that must be synthesized in order to make sense of the brain. However, due to the heterogeneit...
متن کاملCausal Processes and Interactions: What Are They and What Are They Good For?
Concerning any object of philosophical analysis, we can ask several questions, including the two posed in the title of this paper. Despite difficulties in formulating a precise criterion to distinguish causal processes from pseudoprocesses, and causal interactions from mere spatiotemporal intersections, I argue that Salmon answered the first of these questions with extraordinary clarity. The se...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
سال: 2016
ISSN: 0012-1622
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13189